U.S. Representative for Tennessee’s 7th District
Matt Van Epps
Replaces Mark E. Green
From public records: votes from Voteview, bills from congress.gov, money from FEC filings · votes updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we measure
Position · +0.61
- In office
- House 2025–now
Under a year in CongressMore senior than 1% of the House - Committees
- Homeland Security 17th majority
- Science, Space, and Technology 21st majority
- Age
- 43
2026 election
Running for re-election
General election Nov 3, 2026
Also running
- DDarden Hunter Copeland$1.3M
- RStewart Thomas Parks$363K
- DVincent Dixie$266K
- DSaletta Holloway$91K
- RJason Knight$46K
Counts, not a score: statements as the Statements tab counts them, bills by introduction date, roll calls the member voted in, breaks on party-line votes.
StatementsBills
Words go to Armed Forces and National Security, Government Operations and Politics and Energy; bills go to Armed Forces and National Security and Crime and Law Enforcement.
- He talks most about: Armed Forces & National Security (Armed Forces and National Security), Military Readiness (Armed Forces and National Security), Constituent Services (Government Operations and Politics), Government Spending (Government Operations and Politics), AI Infrastructure Impact (Science, Technology, Communications).
- 9 bills sponsored, most on Armed Forces and National Security.
No committee or party leadership post, more senior than 1% of the House, in the majority.
- Under a year in Congress: more senior than 1% of the House.
- Majority: Republicans and the independents who caucus with them hold 219 of the 433 filled seats.
His cosponsorships on Democratic bills
Closest within his party
Closest across the aisle
Closest across the aisle Pro The members of the other party who vote most like Van Epps.
Free account See ProAgreement on contested votes where both cast yea or nay, this Congress · Voteview
8% of his cosponsorships go to Democratic bills (peer median 10%); closest in his party: Shreve and Hinson.
- Other-party share of cosponsors on his own bills: not yet tracked.
- Caucus memberships: not yet tracked.
His billsExpected for a peer
0.28expected 1.09 · average member 1.00
1 of 8 bills passed the House; 0 became law; effectiveness 0.28 against a peer median of 1.09.
- On the move: H.R. 8168 (passed a chamber).
- Amendments offered and adopted, earmarks in dollars: not yet tracked.
119th Congress so far · bills from congress.gov
With his party on all 7 areas with 10 or more party-line votes so far.
Major bills of the Congress · final passage
- H.R. 1 One Big Beautiful Bill Act May 22, 2025 R 215–2 not yet in office
- H.R. 5371 Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 Sep 19, 2025 R 216–2 not yet in office
- H.R. 1968 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 Mar 11, 2025 R 216–1 not yet in office
- H.R. 7148 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 Jan 22, 2026 YEA R 192–24
- H.R. 4 Rescissions Act of 2025 Jun 12, 2025 R 214–4 not yet in office
- S. 2 Secure America Act Jun 9, 2026 YEA R 214–1
- H.J.Res. 89 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". Apr 30, 2025 R 215–1 not yet in office
- H.J.Res. 88 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". May 1, 2025 R 211–0 not yet in office
- H.J.Res. 35 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions". Feb 26, 2025 R 214–1 not yet in office
- H.J.Res. 87 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". Apr 30, 2025 R 218–1 not yet in office
Voted with his party on 2 of the 2 he voted on.
The same ten bills on every profile, chosen by a rule from the roll calls, statements and lobbying filings on file · Method · party column: Republicans yea–nay on that roll call.
Votes with Republicans on 99% of party-line votes, breaks 2 times (peer median 8).
- Position: +0.61, inside the Republican middle 80%.
- Most breaks by area: Economics and Public Finance 1 of 21.
Distance from party, not an ideology score · areas under 10 party-line votes not shown.
Where the money comes from, 2025–26
Small-dollar individualsLarge individualsPACs and other committeesTransfers and other
70% of what he raised came from individuals; 18% came in gifts of $200 or less (chamber median 7%).
$2.6M raised, 26% from PACs and other committees (chamber median 36%).
- Last election margin: not on file.
21 PACs of the 49 that gave belong to organizations that lobbied on bills he faced a vote on, cosponsored or sponsored.
Top lobbying issues of the organizations behind the PACs that gave to him: Taxation, Budget/Appropriations and Transportation.
What each PAC gave Pro Amounts, the full list and each organization’s lobbying are part of Pro.
Free account See ProParty split is the PAC’s giving to all federal candidates · FEC
What those organizations lobby on
52 bills
Van Epps voted Yea on 26, Nay on 2, and sponsored or cosponsored 24 with no recorded vote.
Positions are being checked before they go public; this question fills in when they are.
