U.S. Representative for New York’s 21st District
Elise M. Stefanik
From public records: votes from Voteview, bills from congress.gov, money from FEC filings · votes updated Nov 4, 2026 · How we measure
Position · +0.31
- In office
- House 2015–now
11 years in CongressMore senior than 66% of the House - Committees
- Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 2nd majority
- Education and Workforce 6th majority
- Armed Services 7th majority
- Age
- 42
2026 election
Not on the November ballot
General election Nov 3, 2026
On the ballot for this seat
- RAnthony Constantino$17.1M
- DBlake Gendebien$7.7M
Counts, not a score: statements as the Statements tab counts them, bills by introduction date, roll calls the member voted in, breaks on party-line votes.
StatementsBills
Words go to Government Operations and Politics, Armed Forces and National Security and Immigration; bills go to Crime and Law Enforcement and Government Operations and Politics.
- She talks most about: Government Accountability (Government Operations and Politics), Armed Forces & National Security (Armed Forces and National Security), Government Spending (Government Operations and Politics), Military Readiness (Armed Forces and National Security), Immigration Enforcement (Immigration).
- 29 bills sponsored, most on Crime and Law Enforcement.
No committee or party leadership post, more senior than 66% of the House, in the majority.
- 11 years in Congress: more senior than 66% of the House.
- Majority: Republicans and the independents who caucus with them hold 219 of the 433 filled seats.
Her cosponsorships on Democratic bills
Closest within her party
Closest across the aisle
Closest across the aisle Pro The members of the other party who vote most like Stefanik.
Free account See ProAgreement on contested votes where both cast yea or nay, this Congress · Voteview
10% of her cosponsorships go to Democratic bills (peer median 9%); closest in her party: Johnson and Bice.
- Other-party share of cosponsors on her own bills: not yet tracked.
- Caucus memberships: not yet tracked.
Her billsExpected for a peer
1.52expected 1.22 · average member 1.00
3 of 28 bills passed the House; 0 became law; effectiveness 1.52 against a peer median of 1.22.
- On the move: H.R. 9203 (out of committee), H.R. 7894 (out of committee), H.R. 5213 (out of committee).
- Amendments offered and adopted, earmarks in dollars: not yet tracked.
119th Congress so far · bills from congress.gov
With her party on all 11 areas with 10 or more party-line votes so far.
Major bills of the Congress · final passage
- H.R. 1 One Big Beautiful Bill Act May 22, 2025 YEA R 215–2
- H.R. 5371 Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 Sep 19, 2025 YEA R 216–2
- H.R. 1968 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 Mar 11, 2025 YEA R 216–1
- H.R. 7148 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 Jan 22, 2026 YEA R 192–24
- H.R. 4 Rescissions Act of 2025 Jun 12, 2025 YEA R 214–4
- S. 2 Secure America Act Jun 9, 2026 YEA R 214–1
- H.J.Res. 89 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". Apr 30, 2025 YEA R 215–1
- H.J.Res. 88 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". May 1, 2025 YEA R 211–0
- H.J.Res. 35 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions". Feb 26, 2025 — R 214–1
- H.J.Res. 87 Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". Apr 30, 2025 YEA R 218–1
Voted with her party on 9 of the 9 she voted on.
The same ten bills on every profile, chosen by a rule from the roll calls, statements and lobbying filings on file · Method · party column: Republicans yea–nay on that roll call.
Votes with Republicans on 97% of party-line votes, breaks 11 times (peer median 7).
- Position: +0.31, outside the Republican middle 80%.
- Most breaks by area: Economics and Public Finance 8 of 49, Armed Forces & National Security 1 of 37.
Distance from party, not an ideology score · areas under 10 party-line votes not shown.
Where the money comes from, 2025–26
Small-dollar individualsLarge individualsPACs and other committeesTransfers and other
49% of what she raised came from individuals; 49% came in gifts of $200 or less (chamber median 7%).
$5.0M raised, 6% from PACs and other committees (chamber median 36%).
- Last general election for the seat (2024): won by 24 points.
23 PACs of the 38 that gave belong to organizations that lobbied on bills she faced a vote on, cosponsored or sponsored.
Top lobbying issues of the organizations behind the PACs that gave to her: Taxation, Budget/Appropriations and Trade.
- Arenholz0% D
- Emmer Victory Committee0% D
- Highwater0% D
What each PAC gave Pro Amounts, the full list and each organization’s lobbying are part of Pro.
Free account See ProParty split is the PAC’s giving to all federal candidates · FEC
What those organizations lobby on
79 bills
Stefanik voted Yea on 34, Nay on 2, did not vote on 8, and sponsored or cosponsored 35 with no recorded vote.
Positions are being checked before they go public; this question fills in when they are.
